CPT CODE and description
99243 - Office consultation for a new or established patient, which requires these 3 key components: A detailed history; A detailed examination; and Medical decision making of low complexity. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other physicians, other qualified health care professionals, or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient's and/or family's needs. Usually, the presenting problem(s) are of moderate severity. Typically, 40 minutes are spent face-to-face with the patient and/or family.
Medicare no longer accept this code. use other appropriate CPT codes.
average fee amount - $120 - $130
99243 Office consultation for a new or established patient, which requires these three key components:
• A detailed history
• A detailed examination
• Medical decision making of low complexity
Counseling and/or coordination of care with other providers or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient’s and/or family’s needs. Usually, the presenting problem(s) are self limited or minor. Physicians typically spend 15 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family.
CPT Typical Time
99243 45
A consultation occurs when a treating physician seeks an opinion from another physician regarding a patient’s diagnosis or treatment and meets the CPT® requirements for a consultation. An independent medical exam (IME) occurs
when a physician is requested to evaluate a patient by any party or party’s representative and is billed in accordance with section 18-6(G).
Outpatient Consultation RVUs:
CPT® 99243 non-facility = 4.71; facility = 3.96
Consultation - diagnostic service provided by a dentist or physician other than requesting dentist or physician
Office consultation - 99241, 99242, 99243, 99244, 99245 Inpatient consultation - 99251, 99252, 99253, 99254, 99255
CPT consultation codes (99241-99245 or 99251-99255) shall be denied. The provider will need to resubmit the claim with the appropriate new or established evaluation and management codes (99201-99205; 99281-99285; 99221-99223, 99304-99306).In denied instances where the provider is participating, there shall be no member liability.In denied instances where the provider is non-participating, the member’s liability shall be up to the provider’s charge.
Billing and Coding Guidelines
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) decision as of January 1, 2010 to no longer reimburse physicians for CPT consultation codes 99241-99245 or 99251-99255.
In summary, CMS instructs that any physician who sees a patient in the office or other outpatient setting will need to select either a new or established outpatient evaluation and management code (99201-99215 or 99381-99397) rather than a consultation code for Medicare claims depending on the status of the patient (new vs. established).
Per CMS, a physician who sees a patient in the hospital should bill an "initial hospital care" code (99221-99223) for the first visit for Medicare claims. The admitting physician will add modifier AI to their initial hospital service allowing the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) to differentiate between the admitting physician and other physicians providing care. All physicians should use the subsequent hospital care codes (99231-99233) for their follow-up care.
Likewise, per CMS, a physician who sees a patient in a skilled nursing facility should bill an “initial nursing facility care” code (99304-99306) for the first visit for Medicare claims. The admitting physician will add modifier AI to their initial nursing f facility care service, allowing the MAC to identify the physician as the admitting physician of record who is overseeing the patient’s care. All physicians should use the subsequent nursing facility care codes (99307-99310) for their follow-up care.
CPT codes 99241-99245 and CPT 99251-99255 have a status indicator of “I” in the January 2010 National Physician Fee Schedule. The status indicator of “I” is defined as:
“I” = Not valid for Medicare purposes. Medicare uses another code for reporting of, and payment for, these services.
For Commercial plans, there will be no change in reimbursement for CPT codes 99241-99245 and 99251-99255 at this time. Physicians may continue to submit claims for these services, and will be reimbursed according to UnitedHealthcare payment policies.
For example UnitedHealthcare Medicare Solutions, including SecureHorizons®, AARP® MedicareComplete®, Evercare®, and AmeriChoice® Medicare Advantage benefit plans, these plans will follow CMS regulations and implement the change, effective January 1, 2010. The change also includes the revalued relative-value units (RVUs) for E&M CPT codes and a new coding edit, consistent with CMS, to deny the CPT consult code as a non-payable service.
For AmeriChoice Medicaid health plans, in state Medicaid plans that follow Medicare rules for their fee schedules, AmeriChoice will be aligning with CMS and implement the change, effective January 1, 2010.
For all other Medicaid states, AmeriChoice will follow the UnitedHealthcare commercial position and continue to pay for the consult codes, until directed by each state to pursue other strategies.
Insurance will consider services when resubmitted with the recommended new or established evaluation and management code (99201-99205; 99281-99285; 99221-99223, 99304-99306) as per CMS guidelines for physicians who see patients in the office or an outpatient/inpatient setting.
This policy shall apply to participating and non-participating professional providers.
CPT consultation codes (99241-99245 or 99251-99255) shall be denied. The provider will need to resubmit the claim with the appropriate new or established evaluation and management codes (99201-99205; 99281-99285; 99221-99223, 99304-99306).In denied instances where the provider is participating, there shall be no member liability.In denied instances where the provider is non-participating, the member’s liability shall be up to the provider’s charge.
Denial process
CPT consultation codes (99241-99245 or 99251-99255) shall be denied. The provider will need to resubmit the claim with the appropriate new or established evaluation and management codes (99201-99205; 99281-99285; 99221-99223, 99304-99306).In denied instances where the provider is participating, there shall be no member liability.In denied instances where the provider is non-participating, the member’s liability shall be up to the provider’s charge.
CPT CODE 99243 has to be rebilled as 99203, 99213 or 99283 for Medicre and Medicare HMOs.
BCBSNC will replace a code billed for a subsequent office or other outpatient consultation within 6 months of the initial office or other outpatient consultation by the same provider for the same member with the appropriate level of established office visit. The crosswalk is as follows:
99241 to 99212
99242 to 99212
99243 to 99213
CONSULTATIONS
Note: Much of the confusion in reporting consultative services begins with terms used to describe the service requested. The terms “consultation” and “referral” may be mistakenly interchanged. These terms are not synonymous. Careful documentation of the services requested and provided will alleviate much of this confusion.
When a physician refers a patient to another physician it should not automatically be considered a consultation. A consultation would be appropriate if the service provided meets the criteria described below. Services provided that do not meet the criteria below should not be billed using consultation codes.
Louisiana Medicaid reimburses for a consultation, in either a hospital or office setting when:
• The service is performed by a physician other than the attending/primary care physician.
• The consultation is performed at the request of the attending/primary care physician, i.e., the ‘requesting physician’. This physician’s request for the consultation, as well as the need for the consultation, must be documented in the patient’s medical record.
• Consultations should not be requested unless they are medically necessary, unduplicative, reasonable, and needed for adequate diagnosis and/or treatment. The patient’s medical records must be available for review, and the documentation therein must substantiate the need for the consultation. Consultations for patients with simple diagnoses or who require non-complex care are not covered.
• The physician consultant may initiate diagnostic services.
• The consulting physician renders an opinion and/or gives advice to the requesting physician regarding the evaluation and/or management of a patient. The consultant’s opinion and any services that were ordered or performed must also be documented in the patient’s medical record and communicated by written report to the requesting physician.
• Both physicians’ records should be reflective of the request for, and the results of the consultation.
• Confirmatory consultations are not covered.
• All claims are subject to post-payment review.
Billing for Consultations
The following criteria should be used to determine if a consultation code may be billed:
• See “Note” and consultation criteria on the previous page to determine if the service is a “referral” or a “consultation” prior to billing for consultations.
• If the consulting physician is to perform any indicated surgery, a consultation MAY NOT be billed. The appropriate level evaluation and management code may be billed if it does not conflict with global surgery policy. The GSP takes priority over consultation policy for recipients regardless of their age.
• If, by the end of the service, the consulting physician determines and documents in the patient’s record that the patient does not warrant further treatment by the consultant, the consultation code should be billed. If the patient returns at a later date for treatment, subsequent visits should be billed using the appropriate level evaluation and management service codes.
• If, by the end of the consultation, the consulting physician knows or suspects that the patient will have to return for treatment, the appropriate level evaluation and management code should be billed rather than the consultation code. The patient’s record should document the fact that the consulting physician expects to treat the patient again.
Recipients Age 21 or Older
One consultation may be billed in conjunction with diagnostic procedures, if it meets the definition of a consultation as previously described. Follow-up consultations for recipients who are age 21 or older are not covered by Louisiana Medicaid.
Recipients Under Age 21 Outpatient Consultations
• Outpatient consultation policy does not apply to state-funded foster children (aid category 15).
• Three office consultations per recipient per specialty per 180 days are allowed. (The consultant should be a specialist who is asked by the requesting physician to advise him on the management of a particular aspect of the recipient’s care on three different occasions within a six month period.) If a fourth consultation is needed, reimbursement will be made only after the documentation has been reviewed and medical necessity of the additional consultations is approved by Medical Review.
• A consultation by a provider of the same specialty as that of the requesting physician will be allowed when circumstances are of an emergent nature as supported by diagnosis;
and the requesting physician needs immediate consultation regarding the patient’s condition. In this circumstance, no higher consultation code than 99244 should be billed.
These claims will be sent to Medical Review and a review of the documentation will be made before reimbursement is authorized.
• The consulting physician may always bill for the initial consultation, if it meets the definition of a consultation as previously described. However, if the consultant subsequently assumes responsibility for some or all of the patient’s care after the initial consultation, he/she must bill evaluation and management codes for established patients.
If a provider bills an evaluation and management code for the initial visit, the provider cannot then bill a consultation code for subsequent visits.
• Claims for consultations should indicate the name of the requesting provider, which should be different from that of the consulting physician.
• The consulting physician should not have served as the primary care or concurrent care provider within the 180 days prior to performing the consultation.
Inpatient Consultations
• Inpatient consultation policy does not apply to state-funded foster children.
• One initial and two follow-up consultations are allowed per recipient per specialty per 45 days. If a third follow-up consultation is needed, reimbursement will be made only after the documentation has been reviewed and medical necessity of the additional consultation is approved by Medical Review.
• A consultation by a provider of the same specialty as that of the requesting physician will be allowed when circumstances are of an emergent nature as supported by diagnosis; and the requesting physician needs immediate consultation regarding the patient’s condition. In this circumstance, no higher consultation code than 99252 should be billed.
These claims will be sent to Medical Review and a review of the documentation will be made before reimbursement is authorized.
• Only one same-specialty consultation will be allowed every 365 days.
• The consulting physician may always bill for his initial consultation, if it meets the definition of a consultation as previously described. However, if the consultant subsequently assumes responsibility for some or all of the patient’s care after the initial consultation, he/she must bill subsequent hospital care codes for established patients for his daily visit services. If a provider bills a hospital visit code for his initial visit, the provider cannot then bill a consultation code for subsequent visits.
• Claims for consultations should indicate the name of the requesting physician, which should be different from that of the consulting physician. The consulting physician should not have served as the primary care or concurrent care provider within 730 days prior to performing the consultation.
Consultations CPT CODES: 99241-99243, 99244-99255
The CMS concurs with American Medical Association “Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)” guidelines related to physician reporting of inpatient and outpatient consultation services 99241-99243, 99244-99255:
99241 Office consultation for a new or established patient, which requires these three key components:
• a problem focused history;
• a problem focused examination; and
• straightforward medical decision making
Counseling and/or coordination of care with other providers or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient’s and/or family’s needs. Usually, the presenting problem(s) are self limited or minor. Physicians typically spend 15 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family. 99242 Office consultation for a new or established patient, which requires these three key components:
• an expanded problem focused history;
• an expanded problem focused examination; and
• straightforward medical decision making Counseling and/or coordination of care with other providers or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient’s and/or family’s needs. Usually, the presenting problem(s) are self limited or minor. Physicians typically spend 30 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family.
The CMS will pay a consultation fee when the service is provided by a physician at the request of the patient’s attending physician when:
• All of the criteria for the use of a consultation code are met;
• The consultation is followed by treatment;
• The consultation is requested by members of the same group practice;
• The documentation for consultations has been met (written request from an appropriate source and a written report furnished the requesting physician);
• Pre-operative consultation for a new or established patient performed by any physician at the request of the surgeon; and
• A surgeon requests that another physician participate in post-operative care (provided that the physician did not perform a pre-operative consultation).Italicized and/or quoted material is excerpted from the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology CPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyrighted 1999 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS apply
Medicare Payments, Reimbursement, Billing Guidelines, Fees Schedules , Eligibility, Deductibles, Allowable, Procedure Codes , Phone Number, Denial, Address, Medicare Appeal, EOB, ICD, Appeal.
Medicare Guideline posts
- Home
- Finding Medicare fee schedule - HOw to Guide
- LCD and procedure to diagnosis lookup - How to Gui...
- Medicare Fee Schedule, Payment and Reimbursement Benefit Guideline,
- Step by step Guide Medicare participation program
- Medicare Fee for Office Visit CPT Codes - CPT Code 99213, 99214, 99203
- Medicare revalidation process - how often provide need to do - FAQ
- Gastroenterology, Colonoscopy, Endoscopy Medicare CPT Code Fee
- Medicare claim address, phone numbers, payor id - revised list
Showing posts with label Consulation service CPT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consulation service CPT. Show all posts
Consultation code survey by ACA
Consultation Codes
In the proposed rule, CMS requests input on Medicare coding and payment policies, including the discontinuation of CPT consultation codes this year. As conveyed in a June 18 letter signed by the AMA and 33 medical specialty organizations, the policy has forced some physicians to cut back services to Medicare patients and discouraged communication between clinicians at the very time CMS is looking for ways to improve care coordination. A survey of affected specialties suggests that continuation of the current policy will lead to additional cutbacks in care and make it impossible for many specialists to purchase electronic medical records systems and adopt new technologies required to launch the transformation envisioned in the ACA.
Specific Survey Findings include:
• Twenty percent of the 5,500 physicians who completed the survey have reduced the number of new Medicare patients in their practice, 12% have reduced time spent with Medicare patients and 10% have reduced or eliminated consultations on hospital inpatients.
• Thirty-nine percent say they will defer purchase of new equipment and/or information technology to compensate for lost revenues. More than a third (34%) are eliminating staff.
• Six percent have already followed CMS’s suggestion that they no longer need to send a written report back to the referring physician and 19% plan to stop providing a report.
• Although CMS predicted that no specialty would see Medicare revenues decline by more than 3%, nearly three-fourths (72%) of survey respondents saw declines of more than 5% and 30% faced losses greater than 15%.
These findings confirm the AMA’s view that CMS should reverse its current policy and resume payment for consultation codes in Medicare. If the agency declines to adopt a complete solution, it should, at the very least, modify two other policies—involving prolonged services and new patient definitions—that have compounded the problem caused by elimination of the consultation codes.
As laid out in the previously-mentioned letter, in determining whether a service meets the prolonged service criteria, CPT stipulates that, for the inpatient setting, in addition to time spent “face-to-face” with patients, physicians can include time spent on the patients’ floor or unit performing other tasks related to their care. Were CMS to apply the same definition as CPT, consulting specialists could use the prolonged services to obtain fairer reimbursement for particularly long and challenging cases they previously would have billed as consultations. CMS only recognizes the face-to-face time, however, and further discourages coordination of care by essentially denying payment for activities such as creating and reviewing charts, communicating with the family and coordinating with other health care professionals. Cases where it would benefit a physician to use the prolonged service code are relatively limited and their use could be monitored through claims edits. Consequently, it does not appear that conforming to CPT policy on these codes would lead to large increases in Medicare expenditures and the AMA is again requesting that CMS modify its interpretation of the prolonged service codes to match the CPT descriptors.
The issue involving new patient definitions occurs because unlike the consultation codes, visit codes distinguish between new and established patients. The difference can be significant—about $60 for the most complex office visits—and it affects a substantial number of specialist physicians. In the aforementioned survey, for example, 33% of all respondents and more than 70% of some specialties said that more than 25% of their consultations in 2009 were with patients who had been seen previously by another member of the same specialty and group within the past three years.
In CPT, new patients are defined as those who have not been seen by the same physician or another member of the same group and sub-specialty within the last three years. In Medicare, however, a new patient is one “who has not received any professional services, i.e., E/M service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from the physician or physician group practice (same physician specialty) within the previous 3 years. The problem is that physicians often focus on a narrower range of services than are recognized in Medicare’s current list of 42 medical specialties. Thus, for example, if an electrophysiologist treats a particular patient and two years later, the patient is seen by an interventional cardiologist in the same group, the patient will be viewed as an established patient even though the two cardiologists have different areas of expertise.
The current situation is inequitable and the AMA believes that Medicare should comply with the CPT policy of identifying patients seen by physicians in a different sub-specialty as “new” patients. As pointed out in the June 18 letter, correcting its budget neutrality assumptions would provide some additional funding CMS could use to offset or partially offset any cost associated with this change. We recognize, however, that due to variations in the way that different specialties have dealt with the issue of extended training and focused expertise, setting the criteria for determining Medicare-recognized sub-specialties or equivalent expertise will require some further analysis. The AMA would be pleased to assist CMS in identifying affected specialties and creating a work group that could help with this analysis.
In the proposed rule, CMS requests input on Medicare coding and payment policies, including the discontinuation of CPT consultation codes this year. As conveyed in a June 18 letter signed by the AMA and 33 medical specialty organizations, the policy has forced some physicians to cut back services to Medicare patients and discouraged communication between clinicians at the very time CMS is looking for ways to improve care coordination. A survey of affected specialties suggests that continuation of the current policy will lead to additional cutbacks in care and make it impossible for many specialists to purchase electronic medical records systems and adopt new technologies required to launch the transformation envisioned in the ACA.
Specific Survey Findings include:
• Twenty percent of the 5,500 physicians who completed the survey have reduced the number of new Medicare patients in their practice, 12% have reduced time spent with Medicare patients and 10% have reduced or eliminated consultations on hospital inpatients.
• Thirty-nine percent say they will defer purchase of new equipment and/or information technology to compensate for lost revenues. More than a third (34%) are eliminating staff.
• Six percent have already followed CMS’s suggestion that they no longer need to send a written report back to the referring physician and 19% plan to stop providing a report.
• Although CMS predicted that no specialty would see Medicare revenues decline by more than 3%, nearly three-fourths (72%) of survey respondents saw declines of more than 5% and 30% faced losses greater than 15%.
These findings confirm the AMA’s view that CMS should reverse its current policy and resume payment for consultation codes in Medicare. If the agency declines to adopt a complete solution, it should, at the very least, modify two other policies—involving prolonged services and new patient definitions—that have compounded the problem caused by elimination of the consultation codes.
As laid out in the previously-mentioned letter, in determining whether a service meets the prolonged service criteria, CPT stipulates that, for the inpatient setting, in addition to time spent “face-to-face” with patients, physicians can include time spent on the patients’ floor or unit performing other tasks related to their care. Were CMS to apply the same definition as CPT, consulting specialists could use the prolonged services to obtain fairer reimbursement for particularly long and challenging cases they previously would have billed as consultations. CMS only recognizes the face-to-face time, however, and further discourages coordination of care by essentially denying payment for activities such as creating and reviewing charts, communicating with the family and coordinating with other health care professionals. Cases where it would benefit a physician to use the prolonged service code are relatively limited and their use could be monitored through claims edits. Consequently, it does not appear that conforming to CPT policy on these codes would lead to large increases in Medicare expenditures and the AMA is again requesting that CMS modify its interpretation of the prolonged service codes to match the CPT descriptors.
The issue involving new patient definitions occurs because unlike the consultation codes, visit codes distinguish between new and established patients. The difference can be significant—about $60 for the most complex office visits—and it affects a substantial number of specialist physicians. In the aforementioned survey, for example, 33% of all respondents and more than 70% of some specialties said that more than 25% of their consultations in 2009 were with patients who had been seen previously by another member of the same specialty and group within the past three years.
In CPT, new patients are defined as those who have not been seen by the same physician or another member of the same group and sub-specialty within the last three years. In Medicare, however, a new patient is one “who has not received any professional services, i.e., E/M service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from the physician or physician group practice (same physician specialty) within the previous 3 years. The problem is that physicians often focus on a narrower range of services than are recognized in Medicare’s current list of 42 medical specialties. Thus, for example, if an electrophysiologist treats a particular patient and two years later, the patient is seen by an interventional cardiologist in the same group, the patient will be viewed as an established patient even though the two cardiologists have different areas of expertise.
The current situation is inequitable and the AMA believes that Medicare should comply with the CPT policy of identifying patients seen by physicians in a different sub-specialty as “new” patients. As pointed out in the June 18 letter, correcting its budget neutrality assumptions would provide some additional funding CMS could use to offset or partially offset any cost associated with this change. We recognize, however, that due to variations in the way that different specialties have dealt with the issue of extended training and focused expertise, setting the criteria for determining Medicare-recognized sub-specialties or equivalent expertise will require some further analysis. The AMA would be pleased to assist CMS in identifying affected specialties and creating a work group that could help with this analysis.
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
why consultation codes are not covered by Medicare
Consultation Codes
In the proposed rule, CMS requests input on Medicare coding and payment policies, including the discontinuation of CPT consultation codes this year. As conveyed in a June 18 letter signed by the AMA and 33 medical specialty organizations, the policy has forced some physicians to cut back services to Medicare patients and discouraged communication between clinicians at the very time CMS is looking for ways to improve care coordination. A survey of affected specialties suggests that continuation of the current policy will lead to additional cutbacks in care and make it impossible for many specialists to purchase electronic medical records systems and adopt new technologies required to launch the transformation envisioned in the ACA.
Specific Survey Findings include:
• Twenty percent of the 5,500 physicians who completed the survey have reduced the number of new Medicare patients in their practice, 12% have reduced time spent with Medicare patients and 10% have reduced or eliminated consultations on hospital inpatients.
• Thirty-nine percent say they will defer purchase of new equipment and/or information technology to compensate for lost revenues. More than a third (34%) are eliminating staff.
• Six percent have already followed CMS’s suggestion that they no longer need to send a written report back to the referring physician and 19% plan to stop providing a report.
• Although CMS predicted that no specialty would see Medicare revenues decline by more than 3%, nearly three-fourths (72%) of survey respondents saw declines of more than 5% and 30% faced losses greater than 15%.
These findings confirm the AMA’s view that CMS should reverse its current policy and resume payment for consultation codes in Medicare. If the agency declines to adopt a complete solution, it should, at the very least, modify two other policies—involving prolonged services and new patient definitions—that have compounded the problem caused by elimination of the consultation codes.
As laid out in the previously-mentioned letter, in determining whether a service meets the prolonged service criteria, CPT stipulates that, for the inpatient setting, in addition to time spent “face-to-face” with patients, physicians can include time spent on the patients’ floor or unit performing other tasks related to their care. Were CMS to apply the same definition as CPT, consulting specialists could use the prolonged services to obtain fairer reimbursement for particularly long and challenging cases they previously would have billed as consultations. CMS only recognizes the face-to-face time, however, and further discourages coordination of care by essentially denying payment for activities such as creating and reviewing charts, communicating with the family and coordinating with other health care professionals. Cases where it would benefit a physician to use the prolonged service code are relatively limited and their use could be monitored through claims edits. Consequently, it does not appear that conforming to CPT policy on these codes would lead to large increases in Medicare expenditures and the AMA is again requesting that CMS modify its interpretation of the prolonged service codes to match the CPT descriptors.
The issue involving new patient definitions occurs because unlike the consultation codes, visit codes distinguish between new and established patients. The difference can be significant—about $60 for the most complex office visits—and it affects a substantial number of specialist physicians. In the aforementioned survey, for example, 33% of all respondents and more than 70% of some specialties said that more than 25% of their consultations in 2009 were with patients who had been seen previously by another member of the same specialty and group within the past three years.
In CPT, new patients are defined as those who have not been seen by the same physician or another member of the same group and sub-specialty within the last three years. In Medicare, however, a new patient is one “who has not received any professional services, i.e., E/M service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from the physician or physician group practice (same physician specialty) within the previous 3 years. The problem is that physicians often focus on a narrower range of services than are recognized in Medicare’s current list of 42 medical specialties. Thus, for example, if an electrophysiologist treats a particular patient and two years later, the patient is seen by an interventional cardiologist in the same group, the patient will be viewed as an established patient even though the two cardiologists have different areas of expertise.
The current situation is inequitable and the AMA believes that Medicare should comply with the CPT policy of identifying patients seen by physicians in a different sub-specialty as “new” patients. As pointed out in the June 18 letter, correcting its budget neutrality assumptions would provide some additional funding CMS could use to offset or partially offset any cost associated with this change. We recognize, however, that due to variations in the way that different specialties have dealt with the issue of extended training and focused expertise, setting the criteria for determining Medicare-recognized sub-specialties or equivalent expertise will require some further analysis. The AMA would be pleased to assist CMS in identifying affected specialties and creating a work group that could help with this analysis.
In the proposed rule, CMS requests input on Medicare coding and payment policies, including the discontinuation of CPT consultation codes this year. As conveyed in a June 18 letter signed by the AMA and 33 medical specialty organizations, the policy has forced some physicians to cut back services to Medicare patients and discouraged communication between clinicians at the very time CMS is looking for ways to improve care coordination. A survey of affected specialties suggests that continuation of the current policy will lead to additional cutbacks in care and make it impossible for many specialists to purchase electronic medical records systems and adopt new technologies required to launch the transformation envisioned in the ACA.
Specific Survey Findings include:
• Twenty percent of the 5,500 physicians who completed the survey have reduced the number of new Medicare patients in their practice, 12% have reduced time spent with Medicare patients and 10% have reduced or eliminated consultations on hospital inpatients.
• Thirty-nine percent say they will defer purchase of new equipment and/or information technology to compensate for lost revenues. More than a third (34%) are eliminating staff.
• Six percent have already followed CMS’s suggestion that they no longer need to send a written report back to the referring physician and 19% plan to stop providing a report.
• Although CMS predicted that no specialty would see Medicare revenues decline by more than 3%, nearly three-fourths (72%) of survey respondents saw declines of more than 5% and 30% faced losses greater than 15%.
These findings confirm the AMA’s view that CMS should reverse its current policy and resume payment for consultation codes in Medicare. If the agency declines to adopt a complete solution, it should, at the very least, modify two other policies—involving prolonged services and new patient definitions—that have compounded the problem caused by elimination of the consultation codes.
As laid out in the previously-mentioned letter, in determining whether a service meets the prolonged service criteria, CPT stipulates that, for the inpatient setting, in addition to time spent “face-to-face” with patients, physicians can include time spent on the patients’ floor or unit performing other tasks related to their care. Were CMS to apply the same definition as CPT, consulting specialists could use the prolonged services to obtain fairer reimbursement for particularly long and challenging cases they previously would have billed as consultations. CMS only recognizes the face-to-face time, however, and further discourages coordination of care by essentially denying payment for activities such as creating and reviewing charts, communicating with the family and coordinating with other health care professionals. Cases where it would benefit a physician to use the prolonged service code are relatively limited and their use could be monitored through claims edits. Consequently, it does not appear that conforming to CPT policy on these codes would lead to large increases in Medicare expenditures and the AMA is again requesting that CMS modify its interpretation of the prolonged service codes to match the CPT descriptors.
The issue involving new patient definitions occurs because unlike the consultation codes, visit codes distinguish between new and established patients. The difference can be significant—about $60 for the most complex office visits—and it affects a substantial number of specialist physicians. In the aforementioned survey, for example, 33% of all respondents and more than 70% of some specialties said that more than 25% of their consultations in 2009 were with patients who had been seen previously by another member of the same specialty and group within the past three years.
In CPT, new patients are defined as those who have not been seen by the same physician or another member of the same group and sub-specialty within the last three years. In Medicare, however, a new patient is one “who has not received any professional services, i.e., E/M service or other face-to-face service (e.g., surgical procedure) from the physician or physician group practice (same physician specialty) within the previous 3 years. The problem is that physicians often focus on a narrower range of services than are recognized in Medicare’s current list of 42 medical specialties. Thus, for example, if an electrophysiologist treats a particular patient and two years later, the patient is seen by an interventional cardiologist in the same group, the patient will be viewed as an established patient even though the two cardiologists have different areas of expertise.
The current situation is inequitable and the AMA believes that Medicare should comply with the CPT policy of identifying patients seen by physicians in a different sub-specialty as “new” patients. As pointed out in the June 18 letter, correcting its budget neutrality assumptions would provide some additional funding CMS could use to offset or partially offset any cost associated with this change. We recognize, however, that due to variations in the way that different specialties have dealt with the issue of extended training and focused expertise, setting the criteria for determining Medicare-recognized sub-specialties or equivalent expertise will require some further analysis. The AMA would be pleased to assist CMS in identifying affected specialties and creating a work group that could help with this analysis.
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
Does consult code accepted by Medicare HMO
Consults codes and Medicare HMOs
Medicare HMO plan does not cover the consultation service.
Insurance name
1 Medicare
2 Humana (HMO)
3 Freedom Health
4 AVMED
5 Advantra Gold plus ( Coventry )
6 Universal Health
7 Wellcare
8 AARP Medicare completed
9 UHC (HMO)
10 Polk County
11 PUP
12 QHP
13 Amerigroup
14 Citruscare
Medicare HMO plan does not cover the consultation service.
Insurance name
1 Medicare
2 Humana (HMO)
3 Freedom Health
4 AVMED
5 Advantra Gold plus ( Coventry )
6 Universal Health
7 Wellcare
8 AARP Medicare completed
9 UHC (HMO)
10 Polk County
11 PUP
12 QHP
13 Amerigroup
14 Citruscare
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
CPT 95811 AND covered diagnosis
Medicare is establishing the following coverage for CPT/HCPCs 95811:
Covered for ICD-9-CM indications:
Covered for ICD-9-CM indications:
278.01 | MORBID OBESITY |
307.41 - 307.48 | TRANSIENT DISORDER OF INITIATING OR MAINTAINING SLEEP - REPETITIVE INTRUSIONS OF SLEEP |
327.20 - 327.23 | ORGANIC SLEEP APNEA, UNSPECIFIED - OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (ADULT) (PEDIATRIC) |
327.26 - 327.27 | SLEEP RELATED HYPOVENTILATION/HYPOXEMIA IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIABLE ELSEWHERE - CENTRAL SLEEP APNEA IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE |
327.29 | OTHER ORGANIC SLEEP APNEA |
327.30 - 327.37 | CIRCADIAN RHYTHM SLEEP DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED - CIRCADIAN RHYTHM SLEEP DISORDER IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE |
327.39 | OTHER CIRCADIAN RHYTHM SLEEP DISORDER |
327.40 - 327.44 | ORGANIC PARASOMNIA, UNSPECIFIED - PARASOMNIA IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE |
327.49 | OTHER ORGANIC PARASOMNIA |
327.8 | OTHER ORGANIC SLEEP DISORDERS |
347.00 - 347.01 | NARCOLEPSY, WITHOUT CATAPLEXY - NARCOLEPSY, WITH CATAPLEXY |
347.10 - 347.11 | NARCOLEPSY IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE, WITHOUT CATAPLEXY - NARCOLEPSY IN CONDITIONS CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE, WITH CATAPLEXY |
518.83 | CHRONIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE |
780.51 | INSOMNIA WITH SLEEP APNEA, UNSPECIFIED |
780.53 | HYPERSOMNIA WITH SLEEP APNEA, UNSPECIFIED |
780.57 - 780.58 | UNSPECIFIED SLEEP APNEA - SLEEP RELATED MOVEMENT DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED |
HCPCS CPT 80053, 80048, 80050 and 36415 -Claim Review
80053: Comprehensive metabolic panel
Effective for dates of service on and after January 1, 2012, A/B MACs (B) shall allow organ disease panel codes (i.e., HCPCS codes 80047, 80048, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, and 80076) to be billed by independent laboratories for AMCC panel tests furnished to ESRD eligible beneficiaries if: • The beneficiary is not receiving dialysis treatment for any reason (e.g., posttransplant beneficiaries), or
• The test is not related to the treatment of ESRD, in which case the supplier would append modifier “AY”.
Effective for dates of service on and after April 1, 2015, A/B MACs (A) shall allow organ disease panel codes (i.e., HCPCS codes 80047, 80048, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, and 80076) to be billed by ESRD facilities for AMCC panel tests furnished to ESRD eligible beneficiaries if:
• These codes best describe the laboratory services provided to the beneficiary, which are paid under the ESRD PPS, or
• The test is not related to the treatment of ESRD, in which case the ESRD facility would append modifier “AY” and the service may be paid separately from the ESRD PPS.
The organ and disease oriented panels (80048, 80051, 80053, and 80076) are subject to the 50 percent rule. However, clinical diagnostic laboratories shall not bill these services as panels, they must be billed individually. Laboratory tests that are not covered under the composite rate and that are furnished to CAPD end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients dialyzing at home are billed in the same way as any other test furnished home patients.
“Do not report two or more panel codes that include any of the same constituent tests performed from the same patient collection. If a group of tests overlaps two or more panels, report the panel that incorporates the greater number of tests to fulfill the code definition and report the remaining tests using individual test codes (e.g., do not report 80047 in conjunction with 80053).”
Based on the new information from CPT, UnitedHealthcare’s Laboratory Rebundling Policy will no longer consider the submission of CPT 80048- Basic Metabolic Panel plus CPT 80076-Hepatic Function Panel as reason to bundle to the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel code, CPT 80053.
However, should the same physician and/or other health care professional report CPT 80053 with CPT 80048 or CPT 80076 for the same patient on the same date of service, CPT 80048 or CPT 80076 will not be reimbursed separately. This also aligns with CPT coding guidance. CPT panel code 80053 includes all of the components of CPT panel code 80048 and all the components of CPT panel code 80076, except for CPT 82248. Therefore, the charges for CPT 82248 should be submitted separately when performed with CPT 80053 for the same date of service
Lab Panels Organ- or disease-oriented lab panels were developed to allow for coding of a group of tests. Providers are expected to bill the lab panel when all the tests listed within each panel are performed on the same date of service. When one or more of the tests within the panel are not performed on the same date of service, providers may bill each test individually. Providers may not bill for a panel and all the individual tests listed within that panel on the same day. However, other tests performed in addition to those listed on the panel on the same date of service may be reported separately, in addition to the panel code. Providers must follow CPT coding guidelines when reporting multiple panels. For example, providers cannot report basic panel code 80048 with comprehensive panel code 80053 on the same date of service, because all the lab tests in 80048 are components of 80053.
80051 QW 1. Abaxis Piccolo Blood Chemistry
Analyzer (Electrolyte Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood}
Abaxis, Inc. Measures carbon dioxide, chloride, potassium, and sodium in whole blood
2. Abaxis Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer (Electrolyte Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood} Abaxis, Inc.
80053QW 1. Abaxis Piccolo Blood Chemistry Analyzer (Comprehensive Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood}
Abaxis, Inc. Measures alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, albumin, total bilirubin, total calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, creatinine, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, potassium, total protein, sodium, and urea nitrogen in
whole blood
New Jersey Claim Review on HCPCS 80053 and 36415
In an effort to safeguard the Medicare Trust Fund by lowering the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) paid claims error rate, Highmark Medicare Services’ Medical Review Department performs reviews and provides education based on data analysis performed to identify problem areas. The CERT program is the driver of this data analysis. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Highmark Medicare Services uses the information from the CERT error rate findings to determine the underlying reasons for claim errors and develops appropriate action plans to improve compliance in payment, claims processing, and provider billing practices.
Recent CERT data analysis indicated that there were multiple claim errors in New Jersey for procedure code 80053, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, and procedure code 36415, Venipuncture.
As a result of this data analysis, Highmark Medicare Services’ Medical Review Department conducted a widespread post payment edit in New Jersey on procedure codes 80053 and 36415.
Our findings indicated that approximately 48% of the claims sampled were billed incorrectly. The majority of the denials were based on the following:
Physician orders were not signed and dated.
No documentation in the medical record to indicate that the physician ordered the test.
As a result of these edit findings, and to reduce the overall claims payment error rate, a
prepayment edit will be implemented on procedure codes 80053 and 36415 for New Jersey providers.
Medical records will be requested to verify that services billed were rendered, medically necessary, adequately documented, and billed appropriately to the Medicare program. If the requested medical record documentation is not made available upon request to support services billed, the service may be denied.
Unbundling of Services – identifies procedures that have been unbundled.
Example: Unbundling lab panels. If component lab codes are billed on a claim along with a more comprehensive lab panel code that more accurately represents the service performed, the software will bundle the component codes into the more comprehensive panel code. The software will also deny multiple claim lines and replace those lines with a single, more comprehensive panel code when the panel code is not already present on the claim.
Code Description Status
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel Disallow
85025 Complete CBC, automated and automated & automated differential WBC count Disallow
84443 Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Disallow
80050 General Health Panel Allow
Explanation: 80053, 85025 and 84443 are included in the lab
Organ or Disease-Oriented Laboratory Panel Codes
**This section on Laboratory Panel Codes does not apply to the UnitedHealthcare CommunityMedicare Plans**
The Organ or Disease-Oriented Panels as defined in the CPT book are codes 80047, 80048, 80050, 80051, 80053, 80055, 80061, 80069, 80074, and 80076. According to the CPT book, these panels were developed for coding purposes only and are not to be interpreted as clinical parameters. UnitedHealthcare Community Plan uses CPT coding guidelines to define the components of each panel.
UnitedHealthcare Community Plan also considers an individual component code included in the more comprehensive Panel Code when reported on the same date of service by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional. The Professional Edition of the CPT ® book, Organ or DiseaseOriented Panel section states: "Do not report two or more panel codes that include any of the same constituent tests performed from the same patient collection. If a group of tests overlaps two or more panels, report the panel that incorporates the greater number of tests to fulfill the code definition and report the remaining tests using individual test codes."
For reimbursement purposes, UnitedHealthcare Community Plan differs from the CPT book's inclusion of the specific number of Component Codes within an Organ or Disease-Oriented Panel. UnitedHealthcare Community Plan will deny the individual Component Codes and require the provider to submit the more comprehensive Panel Code. as set forth more fully in the tables below. The tables for CPT codes 80047, 80048, 80050, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, 80074 and 80076 identify the Component Codes that UnitedHealthcare Community Plan will require the submission of the specific panel.
Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), 80047
CPT coding guidelines indicate that a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), CPT code 80047 should not be reported in conjunction with CPT code 80053. If a submission includes CPT 80047 and CPT 80053, both codes will be denied; the services will need to be resubmitted with CPT 80053 to be reimbursed.
There are 2 configurations for a Basic Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80047:
1. A submission that includes CPT code 82330 plus 4 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), CPT code 80047.
Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), 80048
CPT coding guidelines indicate that a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048 should not be reported in conjunction with 80053. If a submission includes CPT 80048 and CPT 80053, only CPT 80053 will be reimbursed. There are 2 configurations for a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048:
1. A submission that includes 5 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048.
Panel Code Component Code Code Description
80048 Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), 80048
Must contain 5 or more of the following Component Codes for the same
patient on the same date of service
82310 Calcium; total
82374 Carbon Dioxide (bicarbonate)
82435 Chloride; blood
82565 Creatinine; blood
82947 Glucose; quantitative, blood (except reagent strip)
84132 Potassium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84295 Sodium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84520 Urea nitrogen (BUN)
General Health Panel, 80050
A submission that includes a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053, a Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, CPT code 84443 and one of the following CBC or combination of CBC Component Codes, either CPT codes 85025 or 85027 + 85004 or 85027 + 85007 or 85025 + 85009 by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a General Health Panel, CPT code 80050.
80050 General Health Panel
Includes the following panel:
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel
Includes the following component code:
84443 Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
Plus one of the following CBC or combination of CBC Component Codes for the same patient on the same date of service:
85025 Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count) and automated differential WBC count 85027 + 85004
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; automated differential WBC count
85027 +
85007
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; blood smear, microscopic examination with manual differential WBC count
85027 +
85009
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; manual differential WBC count, buffy coat When Hepatic Function Panel code 80076 is submitted on the same date of service by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient as General Health Panel code 80050, CPT code 80076 will not be separately reimbursed. Comprehensive Metabolic Panel code 80053, a component of Panel Code 80050, includes all components of Hepatic Function Code 80076 except for code 82248 (bilirubin, direct).
Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, 80053
There are 3 configurations for a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053: 1. A submission that includes 10 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053.
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel
Must contain 10 or more of the following Component Codes for the same patient on the same date of service:
82040 Albumin; serum, plasma or whole blood
82247 Bilirubin; total
82310 Calcium; total
82374 Carbon dioxide (bicarbonate)
82435 Chloride; blood
82565 Creatinine; blood
82947 Glucose quantitative, blood (except reagent strip)
84075 Phosphatase, alkaline
84132 Potassium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84155 Protein, total, except by refractometry; serum, plasma or whole blood
84295 Sodium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84450 Transferase, aspartate amino (AST) (SGOT)
84460 Transferase, alanine amino (ALT) (SGPT)
84520 Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Effective for dates of service on and after January 1, 2012, A/B MACs (B) shall allow organ disease panel codes (i.e., HCPCS codes 80047, 80048, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, and 80076) to be billed by independent laboratories for AMCC panel tests furnished to ESRD eligible beneficiaries if: • The beneficiary is not receiving dialysis treatment for any reason (e.g., posttransplant beneficiaries), or
• The test is not related to the treatment of ESRD, in which case the supplier would append modifier “AY”.
Effective for dates of service on and after April 1, 2015, A/B MACs (A) shall allow organ disease panel codes (i.e., HCPCS codes 80047, 80048, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, and 80076) to be billed by ESRD facilities for AMCC panel tests furnished to ESRD eligible beneficiaries if:
• These codes best describe the laboratory services provided to the beneficiary, which are paid under the ESRD PPS, or
• The test is not related to the treatment of ESRD, in which case the ESRD facility would append modifier “AY” and the service may be paid separately from the ESRD PPS.
The organ and disease oriented panels (80048, 80051, 80053, and 80076) are subject to the 50 percent rule. However, clinical diagnostic laboratories shall not bill these services as panels, they must be billed individually. Laboratory tests that are not covered under the composite rate and that are furnished to CAPD end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients dialyzing at home are billed in the same way as any other test furnished home patients.
“Do not report two or more panel codes that include any of the same constituent tests performed from the same patient collection. If a group of tests overlaps two or more panels, report the panel that incorporates the greater number of tests to fulfill the code definition and report the remaining tests using individual test codes (e.g., do not report 80047 in conjunction with 80053).”
Based on the new information from CPT, UnitedHealthcare’s Laboratory Rebundling Policy will no longer consider the submission of CPT 80048- Basic Metabolic Panel plus CPT 80076-Hepatic Function Panel as reason to bundle to the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel code, CPT 80053.
However, should the same physician and/or other health care professional report CPT 80053 with CPT 80048 or CPT 80076 for the same patient on the same date of service, CPT 80048 or CPT 80076 will not be reimbursed separately. This also aligns with CPT coding guidance. CPT panel code 80053 includes all of the components of CPT panel code 80048 and all the components of CPT panel code 80076, except for CPT 82248. Therefore, the charges for CPT 82248 should be submitted separately when performed with CPT 80053 for the same date of service
Lab Panels Organ- or disease-oriented lab panels were developed to allow for coding of a group of tests. Providers are expected to bill the lab panel when all the tests listed within each panel are performed on the same date of service. When one or more of the tests within the panel are not performed on the same date of service, providers may bill each test individually. Providers may not bill for a panel and all the individual tests listed within that panel on the same day. However, other tests performed in addition to those listed on the panel on the same date of service may be reported separately, in addition to the panel code. Providers must follow CPT coding guidelines when reporting multiple panels. For example, providers cannot report basic panel code 80048 with comprehensive panel code 80053 on the same date of service, because all the lab tests in 80048 are components of 80053.
80051 QW 1. Abaxis Piccolo Blood Chemistry
Analyzer (Electrolyte Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood}
Abaxis, Inc. Measures carbon dioxide, chloride, potassium, and sodium in whole blood
2. Abaxis Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer (Electrolyte Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood} Abaxis, Inc.
80053QW 1. Abaxis Piccolo Blood Chemistry Analyzer (Comprehensive Metabolic Reagent Disc){Whole Blood}
Abaxis, Inc. Measures alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, albumin, total bilirubin, total calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, creatinine, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, potassium, total protein, sodium, and urea nitrogen in
whole blood
New Jersey Claim Review on HCPCS 80053 and 36415
In an effort to safeguard the Medicare Trust Fund by lowering the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) paid claims error rate, Highmark Medicare Services’ Medical Review Department performs reviews and provides education based on data analysis performed to identify problem areas. The CERT program is the driver of this data analysis. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Highmark Medicare Services uses the information from the CERT error rate findings to determine the underlying reasons for claim errors and develops appropriate action plans to improve compliance in payment, claims processing, and provider billing practices.
Recent CERT data analysis indicated that there were multiple claim errors in New Jersey for procedure code 80053, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, and procedure code 36415, Venipuncture.
As a result of this data analysis, Highmark Medicare Services’ Medical Review Department conducted a widespread post payment edit in New Jersey on procedure codes 80053 and 36415.
Our findings indicated that approximately 48% of the claims sampled were billed incorrectly. The majority of the denials were based on the following:
Physician orders were not signed and dated.
No documentation in the medical record to indicate that the physician ordered the test.
As a result of these edit findings, and to reduce the overall claims payment error rate, a
prepayment edit will be implemented on procedure codes 80053 and 36415 for New Jersey providers.
Medical records will be requested to verify that services billed were rendered, medically necessary, adequately documented, and billed appropriately to the Medicare program. If the requested medical record documentation is not made available upon request to support services billed, the service may be denied.
Unbundling of Services – identifies procedures that have been unbundled.
Example: Unbundling lab panels. If component lab codes are billed on a claim along with a more comprehensive lab panel code that more accurately represents the service performed, the software will bundle the component codes into the more comprehensive panel code. The software will also deny multiple claim lines and replace those lines with a single, more comprehensive panel code when the panel code is not already present on the claim.
Code Description Status
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel Disallow
85025 Complete CBC, automated and automated & automated differential WBC count Disallow
84443 Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Disallow
80050 General Health Panel Allow
Explanation: 80053, 85025 and 84443 are included in the lab
Organ or Disease-Oriented Laboratory Panel Codes
**This section on Laboratory Panel Codes does not apply to the UnitedHealthcare CommunityMedicare Plans**
The Organ or Disease-Oriented Panels as defined in the CPT book are codes 80047, 80048, 80050, 80051, 80053, 80055, 80061, 80069, 80074, and 80076. According to the CPT book, these panels were developed for coding purposes only and are not to be interpreted as clinical parameters. UnitedHealthcare Community Plan uses CPT coding guidelines to define the components of each panel.
UnitedHealthcare Community Plan also considers an individual component code included in the more comprehensive Panel Code when reported on the same date of service by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional. The Professional Edition of the CPT ® book, Organ or DiseaseOriented Panel section states: "Do not report two or more panel codes that include any of the same constituent tests performed from the same patient collection. If a group of tests overlaps two or more panels, report the panel that incorporates the greater number of tests to fulfill the code definition and report the remaining tests using individual test codes."
For reimbursement purposes, UnitedHealthcare Community Plan differs from the CPT book's inclusion of the specific number of Component Codes within an Organ or Disease-Oriented Panel. UnitedHealthcare Community Plan will deny the individual Component Codes and require the provider to submit the more comprehensive Panel Code. as set forth more fully in the tables below. The tables for CPT codes 80047, 80048, 80050, 80051, 80053, 80061, 80069, 80074 and 80076 identify the Component Codes that UnitedHealthcare Community Plan will require the submission of the specific panel.
Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), 80047
CPT coding guidelines indicate that a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), CPT code 80047 should not be reported in conjunction with CPT code 80053. If a submission includes CPT 80047 and CPT 80053, both codes will be denied; the services will need to be resubmitted with CPT 80053 to be reimbursed.
There are 2 configurations for a Basic Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80047:
1. A submission that includes CPT code 82330 plus 4 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, ionized), CPT code 80047.
Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), 80048
CPT coding guidelines indicate that a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048 should not be reported in conjunction with 80053. If a submission includes CPT 80048 and CPT 80053, only CPT 80053 will be reimbursed. There are 2 configurations for a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048:
1. A submission that includes 5 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), CPT code 80048.
Panel Code Component Code Code Description
80048 Basic Metabolic Panel (Calcium, total), 80048
Must contain 5 or more of the following Component Codes for the same
patient on the same date of service
82310 Calcium; total
82374 Carbon Dioxide (bicarbonate)
82435 Chloride; blood
82565 Creatinine; blood
82947 Glucose; quantitative, blood (except reagent strip)
84132 Potassium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84295 Sodium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84520 Urea nitrogen (BUN)
General Health Panel, 80050
A submission that includes a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053, a Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, CPT code 84443 and one of the following CBC or combination of CBC Component Codes, either CPT codes 85025 or 85027 + 85004 or 85027 + 85007 or 85025 + 85009 by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a General Health Panel, CPT code 80050.
80050 General Health Panel
Includes the following panel:
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel
Includes the following component code:
84443 Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
Plus one of the following CBC or combination of CBC Component Codes for the same patient on the same date of service:
85025 Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count) and automated differential WBC count 85027 + 85004
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; automated differential WBC count
85027 +
85007
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; blood smear, microscopic examination with manual differential WBC count
85027 +
85009
Blood Count; complete (CBC) automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC and platelet count)
AND
Blood count; manual differential WBC count, buffy coat When Hepatic Function Panel code 80076 is submitted on the same date of service by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient as General Health Panel code 80050, CPT code 80076 will not be separately reimbursed. Comprehensive Metabolic Panel code 80053, a component of Panel Code 80050, includes all components of Hepatic Function Code 80076 except for code 82248 (bilirubin, direct).
Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, 80053
There are 3 configurations for a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053: 1. A submission that includes 10 or more of the following laboratory Component Codes by the Same Individual Physician or Other Health Care Professional for the same patient on the same date of service is a reimbursable service as a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, CPT code 80053.
80053 Comprehensive Metabolic Panel
Must contain 10 or more of the following Component Codes for the same patient on the same date of service:
82040 Albumin; serum, plasma or whole blood
82247 Bilirubin; total
82310 Calcium; total
82374 Carbon dioxide (bicarbonate)
82435 Chloride; blood
82565 Creatinine; blood
82947 Glucose quantitative, blood (except reagent strip)
84075 Phosphatase, alkaline
84132 Potassium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84155 Protein, total, except by refractometry; serum, plasma or whole blood
84295 Sodium; serum, plasma or whole blood
84450 Transferase, aspartate amino (AST) (SGOT)
84460 Transferase, alanine amino (ALT) (SGPT)
84520 Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
How to billing hospital consultation service
New Medicare Coding for Consultation Services
Crosswalks for Emergency Department Consultations requiring admission of patient into inpatient facility | ||
CPT Consultative Services Code | CPT E/M Codes for Crosswalking | Modifier Required |
99251 | 99221 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) | Yes, you will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99252 | 99221 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) or 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 2) | Yes, you will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99253 | 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) | Yes, you will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99254 | 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 2) or 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 3) | Yes, you will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99255 | 99223 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 3) | Yes, you will need to append Modifier “AI” |
Crosswalks for Inpatient Consultations | ||
CPT Consultative Services Code | CPT E/M Codes for Crosswalking | Modifier Required |
99251 | 99221 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) | Yes, referring physician (not you) will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99252 | 99221 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) or 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 2) | Yes, referring physician (not you) will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99253 | 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 1) | Yes, referring physician (not you) will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99254 | 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 2) or 99222 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 3) | Yes, referring physician (not you) will need to append Modifier “AI” |
99255 | 99223 (Inpatient Initial Visit, level 3) | Yes, referring physician (not you) will need to append Modifier “AI” |
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
Billing office and emergency consult code
New Medicare Coding for Consultation Services
Crosswalks for Office/Outpatient Consultations
Crosswalks for Office/Outpatient Consultations
CPT Consultative Services Code | CPT E/M Codes for Crosswalking | Modifier Required |
99241 | 99201 (new patient level 1) or 99211 (established patient level 1) | No |
99242 | 99202 (new patient level 2) or 99212 (established patient level 2) | No |
99243 | 99203 (new patient level 3) or 99213 (established patient level 3) | No |
99244 | 99204 (new patient level 4) or 99214 (established patient level 4) | No |
99245 | 99205 (new patient level 5) or 99215 (established patient level 5) | No |
Crosswalks for Emergency Department Consultations not requiring admission of patient into inpatient facility | ||
CPT Consultative Services Code | CPT E/M Codes for Crosswalking | Modifier Required |
99241 | 99281 (ER visit level 1) | No |
99242 | 99282 (ER visit level 2) | No |
99243 | 99283 (ER visit level 3) | No |
99244 | 99284 (ER visit level 4) | No |
99245 | 99285 (ER visit level 5) | No |
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
Billing consult code to Medicare - New updated rule
New Medicare Coding for Consultation Services
As of January 1, 2010, Medicare no longer recognizes CPT procedure codes for consultation services (CPT codes 99241- 99245 and 99251-99255). This change represents a very significant change in Medicare payment policy; however, as of now, the change is for Medicare only. Commercial payors have not yet adopted similar guidelines when it comes to consultation services and providers should continue to use the consultation codes for all non-Medicare payors. Surgeons should check with each individual commercial payor to determine if that payor is continuing to accept the 99241-99245 and 99251-99255.
When billing Medicare, providers will be required to use other Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes when they provide services that were previously coded as consultations. Specifically, for office or outpatient consultations, Medicare will not recognize codes 99241- 99245, but will, instead, require providers to bill these services as new (99201- 99205) or established office/outpatient (99211-99215) visits. For inpatient consultations, Medicare will not recognize codes 99251-99255 but will instead require providers to bill these services as initial inpatient patient visits (99221-99223). For inpatient initial hospital visits, the admitting physician will have to append a modifier, AI, in order for the consulting physician to get reimbursed. For Emergency Department consultations, which would have formerly been coded as outpatient consultations (99241-99245), will now be billed as Emergency Department visits (99281- 99285).
Medicaid update
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has eliminated the use of all inpatient and office/outpatient consultation codes for dates of service on or after January 1, 2010. Inpatient codes 99251 to 99255 and outpatient/office codes 99241 to 99245 will no longer be accepted by CMS. As a result, medical providers who are billing under the Tennessee Medical Fee Schedule, which is largely based on Medicare’s reimbursement formula, will need to discontinue the use of inpatient codes 99251 to 99255 and outpatient/office codes 99241 to 99245. Instead, medical providers should bill, as applicable:
• Initial inpatient hospital care: 99221 to 99223
• Subsequent hospital care: 99231 to 99233
• Initial nursing facility care: 99304 to 99306
• New patient office visit: 99201 to 99205
• Established patient office visit: 99211 to 99215
As of January 1, 2010, Medicare no longer recognizes CPT procedure codes for consultation services (CPT codes 99241- 99245 and 99251-99255). This change represents a very significant change in Medicare payment policy; however, as of now, the change is for Medicare only. Commercial payors have not yet adopted similar guidelines when it comes to consultation services and providers should continue to use the consultation codes for all non-Medicare payors. Surgeons should check with each individual commercial payor to determine if that payor is continuing to accept the 99241-99245 and 99251-99255.
When billing Medicare, providers will be required to use other Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes when they provide services that were previously coded as consultations. Specifically, for office or outpatient consultations, Medicare will not recognize codes 99241- 99245, but will, instead, require providers to bill these services as new (99201- 99205) or established office/outpatient (99211-99215) visits. For inpatient consultations, Medicare will not recognize codes 99251-99255 but will instead require providers to bill these services as initial inpatient patient visits (99221-99223). For inpatient initial hospital visits, the admitting physician will have to append a modifier, AI, in order for the consulting physician to get reimbursed. For Emergency Department consultations, which would have formerly been coded as outpatient consultations (99241-99245), will now be billed as Emergency Department visits (99281- 99285).
Medicaid update
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has eliminated the use of all inpatient and office/outpatient consultation codes for dates of service on or after January 1, 2010. Inpatient codes 99251 to 99255 and outpatient/office codes 99241 to 99245 will no longer be accepted by CMS. As a result, medical providers who are billing under the Tennessee Medical Fee Schedule, which is largely based on Medicare’s reimbursement formula, will need to discontinue the use of inpatient codes 99251 to 99255 and outpatient/office codes 99241 to 99245. Instead, medical providers should bill, as applicable:
• Initial inpatient hospital care: 99221 to 99223
• Subsequent hospital care: 99231 to 99233
• Initial nursing facility care: 99304 to 99306
• New patient office visit: 99201 to 99205
• Established patient office visit: 99211 to 99215
Labels:
Consulation service CPT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Top Medicare billing tips
-
Patient Discharge Status Code - Definition A patient discharge status code is a two-digit code that identifies where the patient is at th...
-
CPT CODES and Description 81000 Urinalysis, by dip stick or tablet reagent for bilirubin, glucose, hemoglobin, ketones, leukocytes, nitr...
-
procedure code and description 93922 LIMITED BILATERAL NONINVASIVE PHYSIOLOGIC STUDIES OF UPPER OR LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERIES, (EG, FOR LOW...
-
REIMBURSEMENT GUIDELINES Global Obstetrical (OB) Care As defined by the American Medical Association (AMA), "the total obstetric pa...
-
Procedure code and description 95806 - Sleep study, unattended, simultaneous recording of, heart rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory air...
-
CPT CODE J3301 - Kenalog-40 Injection Kenalog-40 Injection (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension, USP) is a synthetic glucocortic...
-
Frequency Limitations: Testing may be covered up to two times a year in clinically stable patients; more frequent testing may be reasonabl...
-
procedure code and description 11042 -Debridement, subcutaneous tissue (includes epidermis and dermis, if performed); first 20 square cm ...
-
Procedure code and Description 99050 Services provided in the office at times other than regularly scheduled office hours, or days when the...
-
Procedure Code Changes and Description • Deleted Codes * 49080 - Peritoneocentesis, abdominal paracentesis, or peritoneal lavage (diagnostic...